AS SEEN ON BIZJOURNALS.COM ©
View Article

Law firm finds itself on the defense

A former (1) client of Damon & Morey LLP is publicly airing complaints about the law firm.

The charges can be found on a Web site, in e-mails, on a since-removed Niagara Falls Boulevard billboard and in flyers being passed out around town.

Daniel Elia alleges that the Buffalo-based law firm is guilty of legal malpractice because it did not (2) disclose a conflict of interest when Damon & Morey represented both him, as a debtor, and one of his creditors in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. The former owner of the now-defunct D.A. Elia Construction Corp. in Niagara Falls also claims that the firm charged him "unreasonable" legal fees.

"We think this type of conduct is not good for our community and not good for the integrity of the legal system," said Elia, who has outlined his grievances on the Web site www.damon-moreymisconduct.com.
Damon & Morey's managing partner, Peter Marlette, said the courts found the conflicts of interest to be "insignificant."  (3)
"They are looking for a way to relitigate this matter that's been relitigated a million times," Marlette said of Elia and his brother, attorney David Elia, also a principal in the family construction company.

"They're grasping at straws." (4)
Elia claims that the firm disguised its conflict of interest by hiring two outside attorneys to represent a creditor, Construction Pace Setters Inc., and established the creditor's file under a different name, Cozad. He says an original fee estimate of $250,000 ballooned to more than $900,000 in actual charges.

Marlette said courts including the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit have held that Elia's bankruptcy case was successfully completed and that Damon & Morey's legal fees were legitimate.

"Every single court that has ever looked at this case has completely absolved Damon & Morey of any wrongdoing -- in fact, they compliment Damon & Morey on the services provided to Elia," Marlette said. (5)
On Oct. 16, the law firm obtained a court order directing the Erie County Sheriff to collect $342,000 in legal fees from Elia. That money has since been collected, but Marlette was not sure whether previous outstanding legal fees from the firm's 14 years of representing Elia have been paid. (6)

"They're now trying to only cut out snippets of information (on their Web site) and take it out to the public and present a misleading story," Marlette said, noting that the firm is considering legal recourse. (7)

Elia countered, "When they disclosed (the conflict of interest), they didn't disclose it fully, which is unethical."
He said Damon & Morey partner William Savino's handling of the case ended a 40-year friendship between the two, and that he feels "betrayed."

He's seeking a jury trial in state Supreme Court to try the firm for legal malpractice, he said, because he doesn't "want this to happen to anyone else."
Marlette countered by saying the Elias have demonstrated "ridiculous, childish behavior." (8)

"It's just another one of their claims, and it will be shot down and thrown out of court exactly the same way every other single claim they've filed against us has been," he said. "As far as we're concerned, the courts have said this is over." (9)

     

 

 

img img img
 

ELIA RESPONSE TO

BIZJOURNALS ARTICLE

(1) NOT TRUE – it has not yet withdrawn as required by law

(2) (fully)

(3) MISLEADING - Those Courts did not hear about (because Damon & Morey concealed) its secret contingency fee agreement, the actual number of attorneys that Damon & Morey had working against it own client or the false business records it used to conceal the conflict. If those Courts had heard this evidence, they would never have approved Damon & Morey’s fees in full. Also, Damon & Morey would be able to cite the record where these issues were disclosed if they truly were ever before those Courts. Damon & Morey now impugns the integrity of these judges by falsely implying that they awarded it fees despite knowing about this egregious misconduct.

(4) Damon & Morey is in denial; the evidence of its misconduct is clear, convincing and overwhelming.

(5) The Bankruptcy Court was only court that could have looked at the wrongdoing, but it ruled that malpractice claims are to be decided by the State Court. The District Court and the Court of Appeals simply affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling and did not consider the malpractice issues. Damon & Morey knows that not a single court has ever considered Elia’s malpractice claims and it has tried every maneuver it can think of to prevent any court from ever hearing the conclusive evidence of its egregious misconduct

(6) You would think that Damon & Morey would be sure about its fees by now

(7) You would think that with 90 years of experience, a full-service law firm calling on the knowledge and experience of 84 attorneys, 19 paralegals and 93 support staff, Damon & Morey would be able to decide pretty quickly on its legal recourse. The problem is that Damon & Morey knows that it has no legal recourse because the truth is a complete defense to any action that it might bring against the Elias.

(8) At least Damon & Morey is not yet calling the Elias “stinko” or  a miserable, miserable engagement”,  or the “worst”,  that they “haven’t had a guy this bad since…” like it called its former client in St. Rita’s

(9) Not one claim has been ruled upon and the matter is still pending in the Courts


 
img img img
img img img
     
img img img